000			02694nam a22002057a 4500
003			OSt
005			20260505100123.0
008			260505b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9781634636629
040			_aDLC _bEn _cDLC
050			_aDUCE
245			_aGREEN BUILDINGS IN THE U.S. AND CHINA : DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY COMPARISONS / _cEdited by BRENDEN FORESTER
260			_aNew York: _bnova publishers, _c2015
300			_aix, 139 pages. : _bill. ; _c24 cm.
500			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index
520			_aGreen Buildings in the U.S. and China: Development and Policy Comparisons examines how the United States and China have developed green building practices and policies within different economic, institutional, and regulatory contexts. The volume brings together comparative studies that analyze the evolution of sustainable building strategies, focusing on policy frameworks, certification systems, and practical implementation. The book highlights that green building has emerged as a critical response to rising energy consumption and environmental concerns in both countries. In the United States, development has largely been market-driven, supported by voluntary certification systems such as LEED and guided by non-governmental organizations. In contrast, China’s approach is more state-led, with strong government involvement in setting standards, providing incentives, and integrating green building goals into national development plans. Through case studies—including the application of low-impact development (LID) techniques—the book demonstrates how sustainable design practices can reduce environmental impact, improve water management, and sometimes lower project costs. A key theme is the comparison of policy instruments: the U.S. relies more on decentralized, incentive-based mechanisms and private-sector participation, while China emphasizes centralized planning, mandatory standards, and large-scale implementation programs. The book also identifies barriers in both contexts, such as regulatory challenges in the U.S. and capacity or institutional gaps in China, and discusses policy solutions to promote wider adoption of green buildings. Overall, the work provides a comprehensive comparative perspective on how differing governance models shape the development of green buildings, offering insights into policy effectiveness, technological adoption, and future directions for sustainable construction in both countries.
700			_aBRENDEN FORESTER, _eEDITOR. _qBRENDEN FORESTER
856			_yhttp://172.20.27.22:4000/handle/123456789/152 _uhttp://172.20.27.22:4000/handle/123456789/152
942			_2lcc _cBK _n0
999			_c4422 _d4422