| 000 | 01639nam a22002057a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20230503075855.0 | ||
| 008 | 230503b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9780415393966 | ||
| 040 |
_aDLC _ben _cDLC |
||
| 050 | _aDUCE LB2368.Y67 | ||
| 100 |
_aYorke, M. _qMantz Yorke |
||
| 245 |
_aGrading student echievement in Higher education: _bSignals and shortcomings/ _cMantz Yorke. |
||
| 260 |
_aNew York: _bRoutledge, _c2008. |
||
| 300 |
_axiii,239 p. : _bill. ; _c24 cm. |
||
| 500 | _aincludes bibliographic reference and index | ||
| 520 | _aA good degree opens doors which otherwise might remain closed. Yet, as higher education is now a mass rather than an elite system, what is expected of its graduates is different from the expectations of previous generations. Students are expected not only to be able to demonstrate high standards of academic achievement, but also a variety of capabilities that have at different times been given labels such as ‘generic skills’ and ‘transferable skills’. These abilities are difficult to grade for a variety of reasons and some graduates may be losing out because their particular strengths are given insufficient acknowledgement in current summative assessment practices. this book appraises the way in which summative assessment in higher education is approached and shows that the foundations of current practices (in the UK and elsewhere) are of questionable robustness. It argues that there is a need to widen the assessment frame if the breadth of valued student achievements is to be recognized adequately. | ||
| 650 |
_2Education _aGrading |
||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cBK _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c1125 _d1125 |
||